tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2070111238846641227.comments2023-04-27T16:29:33.007+08:00Ravindran AssociatesRavindran Associateshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14141650398024907708noreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2070111238846641227.post-55366978313412086032022-11-16T23:12:31.584+08:002022-11-16T23:12:31.584+08:00Thankss great blog postThankss great blog postStair Contractors Boynton Beachhttps://www.stairs-railings.com/us/florida-railings/stair-contractors-boynton-beach.shtmlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2070111238846641227.post-9480731495214045312022-06-06T06:40:59.826+08:002022-06-06T06:40:59.826+08:00Loved reading this thaanksLoved reading this thaanksGia Whttps://www.giawaters.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2070111238846641227.post-44997587388631928652013-10-28T15:44:56.163+08:002013-10-28T15:44:56.163+08:00Hi,the law does not allow a non-Qatari to particip...Hi,the law does not allow a non-Qatari to participate in banking, insurance, commercial agency with <a href="http://www.qataraspect.com/" rel="nofollow">Registered Agents in Qatar</a> or real estate trading activities. Full foreign ownership is also viable for companies registering under different zones.Thanks....Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09701377984223022528noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2070111238846641227.post-46363896726425224342012-11-29T14:17:24.990+08:002012-11-29T14:17:24.990+08:00It is necessary to compare the marks as a whole. E...It is necessary to compare the marks as a whole. Every element of the mark should be considered while finding the similarities and dissimilarities. Appropriate decision taken. <br /><br />GarimaGarimahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08103299035094168666noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2070111238846641227.post-60483547582403845882010-12-13T14:26:01.123+08:002010-12-13T14:26:01.123+08:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.himesh patelnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2070111238846641227.post-79511856433488647642010-04-23T09:51:30.698+08:002010-04-23T09:51:30.698+08:00Thanks for mentioning me. A little by story on how...Thanks for mentioning me. A little by story on how I successfully scored facebook.com/america :<br /><br />I'm a web developer and keep up to date on social media. When I heard that facebook was allowing users to choose their own url I decided to see if I could grab /america. I watched as the time ticked down for the deadline to choose a url, as soon as facebook had the option I copy and pasted america into the box and clicked submit.<br /><br />:) <br /><br />Cheers,<br />Tegan SnyderAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08332535625120381319noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2070111238846641227.post-76337974187799260042010-02-18T10:22:15.697+08:002010-02-18T10:22:15.697+08:00I'm still not convinced a NZ application satis...I'm still not convinced a NZ application satisfies the requirements of S30(3)(c) and that a SG patent should be granted on the basis of a NZ one, despite the specific reference to NZ in Rule 41. That's the nub of the problem. <br /><br />However, if IPOS is prepared to allow it, it's not clear at the moment what harm would be done. The only downside I can think of for now is that the patent could be open to revocation on the ground that it was obtained on a misrepresentation, the misrepresentation being that the claims of the SG patent were related to claims in the corresponding (NZ) application which were examined for inventive step. However, seems unlikely, given the fact IPOS would have contributed to the "misrepresentation" a) by explicitly mentioning NZ in Rule 41 and then b) allowing the SG patent to grant on the basis of the NZ case, even after having raised the issue (of no examination for IS in NZ with the applicant). Not sure post-grant amendments would be necessary or required (or if there really was a problem that it would fix the problem).Mick McLaughlinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13367852528085692287noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2070111238846641227.post-16783354977921104762010-02-18T10:07:32.400+08:002010-02-18T10:07:32.400+08:00Hi Mick, thanks for your comment. Until Rule 41 is...Hi Mick, thanks for your comment. Until Rule 41 is amended, IPOS still has to grant on the basis of NZ patent. Pending clarification on this issue, I think we may have to be creative in our approach to 30(3), including the tortuous interpretation that you mentioned. What do you think of proceeding to grant based on NZ patent, then making post-grant amendments to conform with a later-granted corresponding patent by a prescribed office OR to conform with a granted European patent which was not filed in English (which falls outside Rule 41 and could not be relied on)?VHhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10908396923248907790noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2070111238846641227.post-71418678131815878322010-02-18T09:58:57.035+08:002010-02-18T09:58:57.035+08:00Hi Vicki, Good post and at a relevant time. The ma...Hi Vicki, Good post and at a relevant time. The matter came up for me last week. In hindsight, amazing that it hasn’t come up before now. <br /><br />I believe you’re right to say that IPOS will still allow the patent to grant on the basis of the NZ application - that seems to be their current practice anyway - but it's not clear to me that this is correct practice. Section 30(1)(b) stipulates that the Registrar shall grant a patent subject to the conditions in subsection (3) having been satisfied. Of course one of the requirements of subs(3) is that the claims of the corresponding case were examined for inter alia inventive step. So, for NZ applications, the conditions of subs (3) are not satisfied and maybe the Registrar should not grant a patent based on a corresponding NZ case. (There is a complex argument that the claims of the SG case could be related to the NZ application but also examined for inventive step in another application, but I think that’s too tortuous an interpretation and perhaps not the most practical argument to make.) If the patent shouldn’t be granted based on a NZ case, then it makes something of a mockery of Rule 41 for the purposes of S29(2)(c)(ii). (Probably a Section of the Act takes precedence over an Implementing Regulation in the case of conflict? I checked the Interpretation Act to see if it gave any guidance on how to handle conflicts, but it doesn’t.)<br /><br />It’s all extremely messy. Let me know if you ever get any clarification on it!Mick McLaughlinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13367852528085692287noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2070111238846641227.post-85645290350361659792009-07-24T16:46:32.019+08:002009-07-24T16:46:32.019+08:00And of course the fact that SingTel is a Singapore...And of course the fact that SingTel is a Singapore company and Mitac is Taiwanese had nothing to do with it at all...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2070111238846641227.post-4781206322155322842009-06-12T22:24:12.987+08:002009-06-12T22:24:12.987+08:00Just discovered this useful blog from your main we...Just discovered this useful blog from your main website.<br /><br />Although this blog is dedicated more towards IP rights in Singapore, I think the problems associated with identity theft will be a bigger issue after the 13th.<br /><br />Since it appears that Facebook are reluctant to change the URL's once they have been assigned, it may become difficult to take back the URL from someone who has slyly registered one under your name.<br />(apologies for the deleted post)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2070111238846641227.post-85661936716503643132009-06-12T22:13:17.042+08:002009-06-12T22:13:17.042+08:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2070111238846641227.post-6429304225791755852009-04-29T11:27:00.000+08:002009-04-29T11:27:00.000+08:00Thanks for the tip, Chong Yee!Thanks for the tip, Chong Yee!VHhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10908396923248907790noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2070111238846641227.post-47052325259652646872009-04-27T15:50:00.000+08:002009-04-27T15:50:00.000+08:00Anyone who is flummoxed by the greyed out "submit"...Anyone who is flummoxed by the greyed out "submit" button on the IP Academy registration page can just submit their application to register for this conference, by email, to the IP Academy. We use Safari on Mac OS X and this has been a problem for us, until today.Dr Khoo Chong Yeehttp://www.cantab-ip.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2070111238846641227.post-84947613514477213922009-04-23T15:21:00.000+08:002009-04-23T15:21:00.000+08:00You guys are the Best !
Congratulations !!!You guys are the Best !<br />Congratulations !!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2070111238846641227.post-66313246461178120292009-04-14T12:10:00.000+08:002009-04-14T12:10:00.000+08:00Interesting and informative topic. You did a great...Interesting and informative topic. You did a great job in writing this article. Thanks a lot.BrochuresPrintingOnline.comhttp://www.brochuresprintingonline.comnoreply@blogger.com